HogwartsMaster II#2JY0YC888

Clan level 19 · 141 war wins

Synced 2 hours ago · updates every 3 hours

Hogwarts coaching focus · Clashalytics

War typeBoth Regular CWL

Window7d 30d 90d All

Clan health score

64 / 100

Scored 0 to 100, higher is better.

▸What goes into it

The mean of the four dimensions that actually decide whether this clan wins wars: Engagement, Usage, War attack, and War defense. War defense is a conceded rate, so a low one counts as a good one here.

Not enough tracked-clan data yet to say what to focus on empirically (checked against 17 candidates).

The four focus dimensions

These are this clan's own real rates, not a ranking against other clans, so they will not match the percentile bars above.

▸Why these differ from the bars above

Each is a rate this clan actually produced, on a 0 to 100 scale. Higher is better on three of them; War defense is the share of defences that got 3-starred, so lower is better there. The bars above place the same clan against every other clan tracked here, which is a different question and a different scale.

Engagement88

On a typical day, 88% of the roster shows real evidence of playing: a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend, over the last 28 days. Counted from evidence only, so it understates rather than overstates.

▸How this is scored

Days with real evidence that a member played (a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend), as a share of the days we have been able to watch them. Each member is only measured over their own time in the clan. Evidence only, never a live session log, so it reads low rather than high. Averaged across the roster.

▸Player by player1 needs attention · 2 worth watching · 36 on track

Last

Needs attention (1)

9 of 28 days

No war attack data either. Attended 3 of 4 raid weekends.

542 given · 0 received (current)

Worth watching (2)

On track (36)

UsageGathering data

No finished war recorded here yet. Overview's record comes from the in-game war log, which reaches back further.

War attack86

86% 3-star rate on war attacks.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War attack 3-star rate, summed across every real attack in the CWL wars in the window.

▸Player by player4 needs attention · 0 worth watching · 25 on track

Last

Needs attention (4)

0 of 1 attack 3-starred

Getting the reps (100% used) but not converting -- a base-reading or army-composition conversation, not attendance.

On track (25)

War defense83%conceded

83% 3-starred conceded on war defenses.

→Layout review for the bases conceding 3-star at the highest rate.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War defense 3-star-conceded rate, summed across every real defense in the CWL wars in the window. Lower is better, the same way this number reads on Overview, Rankings and the player page.

▸Player by player24 needs attention · 0 worth watching · 5 on track

Last

Needs attention (24)

1 of 1 defense 3-starred

Strong attacker (100%) with a weak base -- a layout review could be the single biggest lever here.

On track (5)

Also tracked

▸What these two are

Progression and Retention are TH and membership signals, shown here at their real current values alongside the four dimensions above.

Progression100

38 of 39 tracked members up a TH level or 2+ hero levels in the window.

▸How this is scored

Members up a Town Hall or 2+ hero levels in the window, scaled so 30% of the tracked roster reads as 100.

Retention58

67 players have passed through your roster in the last 90 days; 28 have genuinely left (hops excluded) -- 58% retention.

→Retention under 60%. Review recent joiners' first 2 wars, and exit-interview recent leavers if possible.

▸How this is scored

Share of everyone who's passed through the roster in the last 90 days who's still here. Current roster members are never counted as departed.