InjusticeLeagueLegend#2LJPCYGY

Clan level 33 · 640 war wins

Synced 43 minutes ago · updates every 3 hours

War typeBoth Regular CWL

Window7d 30d 90d All

Clan health score

60 / 100

Scored 0 to 100, higher is better.

▸What goes into it

The mean of the four dimensions that actually decide whether this clan wins wars: Engagement, Usage, War attack, and War defense. War defense is a conceded rate, so a low one counts as a good one here.

Focus firstWar attackBetter than 73% of tracked clans

▸How this is scored

War attack, War defense and Usage are compared against every other daily-tier clan's identical roster-wide number, not a theoretical 100 -- a 100% three-star rate isn't realistic against real competition, even for a strong clan. "Focus first" is whichever of the three has the worst percentile among real peers, not the worst raw score.

Engagement isn't part of this comparison -- it's the one dimension where 100% is genuinely reachable (real members already hit it), so it's still read against that flat target rather than a peer percentile.

Percentile against tracked clans, not a score

War attackFOCUS

73%

War defense

87%

Usage

100%

The four focus dimensions

Roster

These are this clan's own real rates, not a ranking against other clans, so they will not match the percentile bars above.

▸Why these differ from the bars above

Each is a rate this clan actually produced, on a 0 to 100 scale. Higher is better on three of them; War defense is the share of defences that got 3-starred, so lower is better there. The bars above place the same clan against every other clan tracked here, which is a different question and a different scale.

Showing the roster as it stands today. 43 players played for the clan in this window and have since left, so those records are hidden here. The clan-wide war figures above count everyone who played either way, which is why the totals and this list are answering slightly different questions.

Engagement49

On a typical day, 49% of the roster shows real evidence of playing: a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend, over the last 28 days. Counted from evidence only, so it understates rather than overstates. 2 of 6 members show none at all.

→Raw Stats and the player page show exactly which members have no recent battle, war, or raid evidence.
→A quiet roster spot is worth a direct check-in before it becomes a departure.

▸How this is scored

Days with real evidence that a member played (a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend), as a share of the days we have been able to watch them. Each member is only measured over their own time in the clan. Evidence only, never a live session log, so it reads low rather than high. Averaged across the roster.

▸Player by player3 needs attention · 2 worth watching · 1 on track

Last

Needs attention (3)

0 of 25 days since joining

No war attack data either. Attended 0 of 3 raid weekends.

265 given · 173 received (current)

Worth watching (2)

On track (1)

Usage73

578 of 790 attacks used.

→Raw Stats lists who left hits unused, per war.
→Bench can't-commit members before prep day ends. An opt-out beats a no-show.

▸How this is scored

War attacks used as a share of attacks available, summed over every completed regular war recorded here in the last 90 days.

▸Player by player1 needs attention · 0 worth watching · 2 on track

Last

Needs attention (1)

7 of 10 attacks used, 5 wars

Also quiet overall (39% engagement) -- likely a real drop-off, not just this window.

On track (2)

War attack68

68% 3-star rate on war attacks.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War attack 3-star rate, summed across every real attack in the regular wars in the window.

▸Player by player0 needs attention · 0 worth watching · 3 on track

Last

On track (3)

7 of 10 attacks 3-starred

Strong, reliable attacker. And holds up against real competition -- 86% mirror or tougher.

War defense49%conceded

49% 3-starred conceded on war defenses.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War defense 3-star-conceded rate, summed across every real defense in the regular wars in the window. Lower is better, the same way this number reads on Overview, Rankings and the player page.

▸Player by player1 needs attention · 1 worth watching · 2 on track

Last

Needs attention (1)

11 of 14 defenses 3-starred

Strong attacker (79%) with a weak base -- a layout review could be the single biggest lever here.

Worth watching (1)

On track (2)

Also tracked

▸What these two are

Progression and Retention are TH and membership signals, shown here at their real current values alongside the four dimensions above.

Progression100

6 of 12 tracked members up a TH level or 2+ hero levels in the window.

▸How this is scored

Members up a Town Hall or 2+ hero levels in the window, scaled so 30% of the tracked roster reads as 100.

Retention4

146 players have passed through your roster in the last 90 days; 140 have genuinely left (hops excluded) -- 4% retention.

→Retention under 60%. Review recent joiners' first 2 wars, and exit-interview recent leavers if possible.

▸How this is scored

Share of everyone who's passed through the roster in the last 90 days who's still here. Current roster members are never counted as departed.