暗鲨Titan II#8VVC80L2

Clan level 35 · 900 war wins

Synced 2 hours ago · updates every 3 hours

War typeBoth Regular CWL

Window7d 30d 90d All

Clan health score

60 / 100

Scored 0 to 100, higher is better.

▸What goes into it

The mean of the four dimensions that actually decide whether this clan wins wars: Engagement, Usage, War attack, and War defense. War defense is a conceded rate, so a low one counts as a good one here.

Focus firstWar attackBetter than 9% of tracked clans

▸How this is scored

War attack, War defense and Usage are compared against every other daily-tier clan's identical roster-wide number, not a theoretical 100 -- a 100% three-star rate isn't realistic against real competition, even for a strong clan. "Focus first" is whichever of the three has the worst percentile among real peers, not the worst raw score.

Engagement isn't part of this comparison -- it's the one dimension where 100% is genuinely reachable (real members already hit it), so it's still read against that flat target rather than a peer percentile.

Percentile against tracked clans, not a score

War attackFOCUS

War defense

45%

Usage

The four focus dimensions

Roster

These are this clan's own real rates, not a ranking against other clans, so they will not match the percentile bars above.

▸Why these differ from the bars above

Each is a rate this clan actually produced, on a 0 to 100 scale. Higher is better on three of them; War defense is the share of defences that got 3-starred, so lower is better there. The bars above place the same clan against every other clan tracked here, which is a different question and a different scale.

Showing the roster as it stands today. 3 players played for the clan in this window and have since left, so those records are hidden here. The clan-wide war figures above count everyone who played either way, which is why the totals and this list are answering slightly different questions.

Engagement70

On a typical day, 70% of the roster shows real evidence of playing: a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend, over the last 28 days. Counted from evidence only, so it understates rather than overstates. 4 of 48 members show none at all.

▸How this is scored

Days with real evidence that a member played (a battle, a war attack, or a raid weekend), as a share of the days we have been able to watch them. Each member is only measured over their own time in the clan. Evidence only, never a live session log, so it reads low rather than high. Averaged across the roster.

▸Player by player9 needs attention · 6 worth watching · 33 on track

Last

Needs attention (9)

0 of 28 days

No war attack data either. Attended 0 of 4 raid weekends.

0 given · 0 received (current)

Worth watching (6)

On track (33)

Usage84

101 of 120 attacks used.

→Raw Stats lists who left hits unused, per war.
→Bench can't-commit members before prep day ends. An opt-out beats a no-show.

▸How this is scored

War attacks used as a share of attacks available, summed over every completed CWL war recorded here in the last 30 days.

▸Player by player0 needs attention · 4 worth watching · 8 on track

Last

Worth watching (4)

6 of 7 attacks used, 7 wars

A little inconsistent, though still active overall (82% engagement) -- likely just a scheduling gap here and there.

On track (8)

War attack44

44% 3-star rate on war attacks.

→Weak-attack flags on Raw Stats, broken out per base.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War attack 3-star rate, summed across every real attack in the CWL wars in the window.

▸Player by player6 needs attention · 5 worth watching · 1 on track

Last

Needs attention (6)

1 of 7 attacks 3-starred

Getting the reps (100% used) but not converting -- a base-reading or army-composition conversation, not attendance.

Worth watching (5)

On track (1)

War defense60%conceded

60% 3-starred conceded on war defenses.

▸How this is scored

Roster-wide War defense 3-star-conceded rate, summed across every real defense in the CWL wars in the window. Lower is better, the same way this number reads on Overview, Rankings and the player page.

▸Player by player7 needs attention · 2 worth watching · 3 on track

Last

Needs attention (7)

6 of 7 defenses 3-starred

Attack is also soft (29%) -- a broader coaching conversation, not just base layout.

Worth watching (2)

On track (3)

Also tracked

▸What these two are

Progression and Retention are TH and membership signals, shown here at their real current values alongside the four dimensions above.

Progression100

46 of 51 tracked members up a TH level or 2+ hero levels in the window.

▸How this is scored

Members up a Town Hall or 2+ hero levels in the window, scaled so 30% of the tracked roster reads as 100.

Retention86

56 players have passed through your roster in the last 90 days; 8 have genuinely left (hops excluded) -- 86% retention.

▸How this is scored

Share of everyone who's passed through the roster in the last 90 days who's still here. Current roster members are never counted as departed.